Zrozumienie wyjścia -XX: + PrintCompilation

Używam kilku mikro benchmarków na kodzie iteracji listy Java. Użyłem flag -XX: + PrintCompilation i -verbose: gc, aby upewnić się, że nic się nie dzieje w tle, gdy czas jest uruchamiany. Widzę jednak coś na wyjściu, którego nie rozumiem.

Oto kod, używam testu porównawczego na:

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class PerformantIteration {

    private static int theSum = 0;

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("Starting microbenchmark on iterating over collections with a call to size() in each iteration");
        List<Integer> nums = new ArrayList<Integer>();
        for(int i=0; i<50000; i++) {
            nums.add(i);
        }

        System.out.println("Warming up ...");
        //warmup... make sure all JIT comliling is done before the actual benchmarking starts
        for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
            iterateWithConstantSize(nums);
            iterateWithDynamicSize(nums);
        }

        //actual        
        System.out.println("Starting the actual test");
        long constantSizeBenchmark = iterateWithConstantSize(nums);
        long dynamicSizeBenchmark = iterateWithDynamicSize(nums);
        System.out.println("Test completed... printing results");

        System.out.println("constantSizeBenchmark : " + constantSizeBenchmark);
        System.out.println("dynamicSizeBenchmark : " + dynamicSizeBenchmark);
        System.out.println("dynamicSizeBenchmark/constantSizeBenchmark : " + ((double)dynamicSizeBenchmark/(double)constantSizeBenchmark));
    }

    private static long iterateWithDynamicSize(List<Integer> nums) {
        int sum=0;
        long start = System.nanoTime();        
        for(int i=0; i<nums.size(); i++) {
            // appear to do something useful
            sum += nums.get(i);
        }       
        long end = System.nanoTime();
        setSum(sum);
        return end-start;
    }

    private static long iterateWithConstantSize(List<Integer> nums) {
        int count = nums.size();
        int sum=0;
        long start = System.nanoTime();        
        for(int i=0; i<count; i++) {
            // appear to do something useful
            sum += nums.get(i);
        }
        long end = System.nanoTime();
        setSum(sum);
        return end-start;
    }

    // invocations to this method simply exist to fool the VM into thinking that we are doing something useful in the loop
    private static void setSum(int sum) {
        theSum = sum;       
    }

}


Oto wyjście.

    152   1       java.lang.String::charAt (33 bytes)
    160   2       java.lang.String::indexOf (151 bytes)
    165   3Starting microbenchmark on iterating over collections with a call to size() in each iteration       java.lang.String::hashCode (60 bytes)
    171   4       sun.nio.cs.UTF_8$Encoder::encodeArrayLoop (490 bytes)
    183   5
       java.lang.String::lastIndexOf (156 bytes)
    197   6       java.io.UnixFileSystem::normalize (75 bytes)
    200   7       java.lang.Object::<init> (1 bytes)
    205   8       java.lang.Number::<init> (5 bytes)
    206   9       java.lang.Integer::<init> (10 bytes)
    211  10       java.util.ArrayList::add (29 bytes)
    211  11       java.util.ArrayList::ensureCapacity (58 bytes)
    217  12       java.lang.Integer::valueOf (35 bytes)
    221   1%      performance.api.PerformantIteration::main @ 21 (173 bytes)
Warming up ...
    252  13       java.util.ArrayList::get (11 bytes)
    252  14       java.util.ArrayList::rangeCheck (22 bytes)
    253  15       java.util.ArrayList::elementData (7 bytes)
    260   2%      performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithConstantSize @ 19 (59 bytes)
    268   3%      performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithDynamicSize @ 12 (57 bytes)
    272  16       performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithConstantSize (59 bytes)
    278  17       performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithDynamicSize (57 bytes)
Starting the actual test
Test completed... printing results
constantSizeBenchmark : 301688
dynamicSizeBenchmark : 782602
dynamicSizeBenchmark/constantSizeBenchmark : 2.5940773249184588


Nie rozumiem tych czterech linii z wyjścia.

260   2%      performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithConstantSize @ 19 (59 bytes)
268   3%      performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithDynamicSize @ 12 (57 bytes)
272  16       performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithConstantSize (59 bytes)
278  17       performance.api.PerformantIteration::iterateWithDynamicSize (57 bytes)


Dlaczego obie te metody są kompilowane dwukrotnie?Jak czytać ten wynik ... co oznaczają różne liczby?

questionAnswers(2)

yourAnswerToTheQuestion