Rozważaćten kod:

#include <memory>
#include <iostream>


class SomeClass {
public:
    SomeClass() {
        std::cout << "SomeClass()" << std::endl;
    }

    ~SomeClass() {
        std::cout << "~SomeClass()" << std::endl;
    }

    void* operator new(std::size_t size) {
        std::cout << "Custom new" << std::endl;
        return ::operator new(size);
    }

    void operator delete(void* ptr, std::size_t size) {
        std::cout << "Custom delete" << std::endl;
        ::operator delete(ptr);
    }
};



int main() {
    std::shared_ptr<SomeClass> ptr1(new SomeClass);
    std::cout << std::endl << "Another one..." << std::endl << std::endl;
    std::shared_ptr<SomeClass> ptr2(std::make_shared<SomeClass>());
    std::cout << std::endl << "Done!" << std::endl << std::endl;
}

Oto jego wyjście:

Custom new
SomeClass()

Another one...

SomeClass()

Done!

~SomeClass()
~SomeClass()
Custom delete

Wyraźnie,std::make_shared() nie zadzwoniłemnew operator - używa własnego alokatora. Czy to jest standardowe zachowanie dlastd::make_shared()?