<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			
			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>Yacoblog - Apple</title>
			<link>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm</link>
			<description>News and Views, Yacoubean style</description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:18:33 -0600</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:41:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>yacoubean@gmail.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>yacoubean@gmail.com</webMaster>
			
			<item>
				<title>Apple&apos;s new Netbook</title>
				<link>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2009/4/29/Apples-new-Netbook</link>
				<description>
				
				So the Apple rumor mill is in full swing about an upcoming Apple Netbook.  I thought I&apos;d join the fun with my predictions.  [More]
				</description>
				
				<category>Apple</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:41:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2009/4/29/Apples-new-Netbook</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>Safari Windows uses parts of IE</title>
				<link>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2008/9/30/Safari-Windows-uses-parts-of-IE</link>
				<description>
				
				I just found something odd...if you have Safari Windows installed, apparently it uses IE&apos;s proxy settings instead of it&apos;s own.  If you click Edit-&gt;Preferences-&gt;Advanced-&gt;Change Settings, Safari pops open the IE Internet Options dialog box.  Firefox has it&apos;s own proxy settings built-in, but apparently Apple decided to use the Windows proxy settings.  I guess that&apos;s not a bad idea, but it surprises me.

On a whim, I checked how Google&apos;s chrome handles proxy settings, and it does the same thing as Safari, it uses the IE settings. 
				</description>
				
				<category>Apple</category>				
				
				<category>Google</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:29:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2008/9/30/Safari-Windows-uses-parts-of-IE</guid>
				
			</item>
			
			<item>
				<title>Apple Switch to Windows</title>
				<link>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2006/2/18/Apple-Switch-to-Windows</link>
				<description>
				
				John C. Dvorak has an article about the possibility of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0%2C1895%2C1923151%2C00.asp&quot;&gt;Apple ditching Mac OS in favor of Windows&lt;/a&gt;.  He believes there is a distinct possibility, and gives some interesting arguments.  For example, &quot;Apple has always said it was a hardware company, not a software company.&quot;  Does anybody doubt that Apple would make a lot more money if they sold Windows on their sparkly hardware?  Sure, they&apos;d seriously offend most of their hard core fans.  But tons of people that care about style in the Windows world would love to run a Mac, &lt;em&gt;if&lt;/em&gt; it had Windows on it.

Personally I think this is all a bunch of conspiracy theory.  And since I&apos;m so cheap, I doubt I&apos;d ever buy a Mac, regardless of what OS it has on it.

&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; Justin pointed out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/25/why-john-c-dvorak-is-wrong-about-apple/&quot;&gt;this rebuttal&lt;/a&gt; for Dvorak&apos;s article. 
				</description>
				
				<category>Apple</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:43:00 -0600</pubDate>
				<guid>http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2006/2/18/Apple-Switch-to-Windows</guid>
				
			</item>
			</channel></rss>