How Adobe Can Kill Silverlight: Linux
This is not my idea, but John C. Dvorak's. Microsoft is making a full frontal attack on Adobe with SilverLight. Dvorak's suggestion is that Adobe should port the full creative suite to Linux, and once that's done make a fully optimized, custom version of Linux for Adobe designers/developers. How would this hurt SilverLight? It wouldn't directly, but it could potentially take money out of Microsoft's coffers (by taking away Windows market share).
I don't know if this would work or not, but I do know that the lack of Photoshop on Linux is one of the major things slowing Linux Desktop adoption. But at the same time...Linux has less than 1% of the market share on the Desktop. So Adobe is faced with this question: "If you build it, will they come?"
Macromedia made a version of ColdFusion for Linux, and Adobe continues to support this version (in fact, they keep expanding to more *nix platforms). I don't know what the market numbers are for their Linux version, but it must be doing OK, or they'd have abandoned it years ago. But of course, we're talking about Linux server, which has a MUCH larger install base than Linux desktop.
Dvorak's logic is that instead of "running" away from the big bear (Microsoft), Adobe should directly attack them where it hurts. I liked this statement at the end of the article: "Maybe it's time to give up on this model and grab a gun and shoot the damned bear. Adobe has a gun and should use it."
Jake Munson
34 Yrs old
Adobe can't even crank out FlexBuilder for Linux in a timely manner so I don't think they are interested in this market at all.
In the meantime I'll keep using Gimp :)
Porting CS over to Linux is pretty useless imo. People on Linux don't wanna pay for any software while Adobe cannot afford making CS free. A deadend.
As for the "making" or "abandoning" a version of CF for Linux, CF is a Java app. It *should* run on any platform (that's the whole point of Java), and in theory there's zero additional engineering work to "make" a Linux version. Not to mention what's their alternative--make a Windows only product?
Linux servers are much more plentiful than Linux desktop, so any company that makes server software is wise to support Linux. However, even if you use Java, I'd think there's still some work to get it running. You have to worry about case sensitivity, for one. But it is a lot easier than if you'd used C++, or something like that.
ColdFusion hides all the Java underpinnings from people, but under the hood that's all it is. The installer just does all the deployment and configuration for you.